Most AI governance stops at a set of principles. The hard part is what happens next: deciding what to invest in, implementing it in a way that can be evaluated, and keeping it under oversight once it is running. This work covers that whole path, and it treats an AI initiative as a project that can fail like any other.
Who this helps
Boards and executives accountable for an organisation's use of AI; public-sector leaders investing in AI under regulatory and public scrutiny; and legal, risk and audit functions that need to understand what they are being asked to approve.
The questions leaders bring
We have AI principles. How do we know whether any given system meets them?
What should we require of a supplier before we buy or build an AI system, and how do we check it?
How do we evaluate an AI system before it goes live, and who is accountable when it drifts afterwards?
Which standards and regulations apply to us now, and which are coming?
Our AI project is behind and the benefits are unclear. Is it a governance problem or a delivery problem?
What the work involves
Governance that can be assessed. Turning principles into assessment questions, evidence requirements and decision rights, so that a governance function can say whether a system meets the organisation's own standard. This is the method of AI Governance and its practitioner companion Garbage In, Gospel Out.
Investment and delivery oversight. Applying project-governance discipline to AI initiatives: clear objectives, staged commitment, evaluation gates, and sponsors who can tell what they are being told.
Evaluation and ongoing oversight. Defining how a system is tested before release, what is monitored after it, and how findings reach the people accountable.
Standards and regulatory orientation. Reading the standards and regulatory position that applies to your organisation, and what it means for a specific decision. Where a jurisdiction-specific legal question arises, that is for your legal advisers; the technical and governance translation is the work here.
What you get
A governance approach your organisation can operate without me; assessment criteria and evidence requirements for the systems you are considering; independent review of a specific AI initiative where one is in trouble; and briefings that give a board a real understanding of the decision in front of it.
Dr Carlton has written six books on AI and cybersecurity governance with Technics Publications, from principles and assessments to a practitioner's implementation workbook and an Australian standards guide, and hosts the podcast AI Governance with Dr Darryl.
A workbook that turns AI governance from a compliance burden into a delivery discipline: mapping an organisation against an AI technical standard, an implementation methodology, procurement and contract governance, and oversight across the AI lifecycle.
A guide to the state of AI governance in Australia at the time of writing: the roles of federal, state and territory government, industry, civil society and academia; Australia's AI ethics principles; and what an organisation investing in AI should be mindful of.
AI Digest Volume 2 More of everything you wanted to know about AI but don't have time to read
Technics Publications
A second volume of summaries of published work on AI, geopolitics, regulation and technology, compiled for readers who need the substance without the reading time. A synthesis of others' work rather than original research.
AI Governance Applying AI Policy and Ethics through Principles and Assessments
A guide for leaders and practitioners to governing AI through principles, ethics and structured assessments: the history and legal setting of AI, eight guiding principles with ways to uphold each, and assessment approaches for organisations.
Cybersecurity Governance A guide for executives who need to understand cybersecurity in plain, actionable language
Cybersecurity explained for boards and executives: how the threat landscape evolved, what compliance requires, how threats differ from vulnerabilities, and what an informed executive response looks like.
AI Digest Volume 1 Everything you wanted to know about AI but don't have time to read
Technics Publications, 2024
Concise summaries of published research and commentary on AI from many institutions, compiled for policymakers, executives and engaged readers. A synthesis of others' work rather than original research.
Questions people ask before engaging
Do we need a governance framework before we start any AI project?
You need enough governance to make the first decision well: what you are trying to achieve, what would make the system unacceptable, and how you will know. A full framework can grow from real projects; it does not have to precede them.
Can you review an AI system a supplier has already built for us?
Yes. The review asks what the system does, what evidence the supplier can produce for its behaviour, how it was evaluated, and whether your contract and oversight give you the control you think you have.
Is this about ethics or about delivery?
Both, and they are inseparable in practice. A system that violates your principles is a failed project; a project that never reaches evaluation cannot be governed at all.
Which countries' rules do you cover?
The governance method is jurisdiction-independent. Dr Carlton has written specifically on the Australian framework and works with organisations in several jurisdictions; the legal position in any one of them is confirmed with your legal advisers.